Development and validation of equilibrium dialysis UHPLC-MS/MS measurement procedures for total and unbound concentrations of bictegravir, dolutegravir, darunavir and doravirine in human plasma. Application to patients with HIV.

BACKGROUND: Fixed-dose combinations of antiretroviral drugs are commonly used to treat HIV infection and therapeutic monitoring is not part of routine clinical practice. However, drug concentrations monitoring might have role in different clinical scenarios as well as for research purposes. This study aimed to develop and validate UHPLC-MS/MS procedures for measuring total and unbound concentrations of bictegravir, dolutegravir, darunavir and doravirine in human plasma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Equilibrium dialysis preceded sample preparation (based on protein precipitation) for measuring unbound antiretroviral concentrations. Chromatographic separations were achieved on an Acquity®-UPLC® HSS™-T3 column (50 mm × 2.1 mm; 1.8 µm) using a non-linear water/acetonitrile gradient containing 0.1 % formic acid at a 0.5 mL/min flow rate. Antiretrovirals were detected by tandem mass spectrometry in positive electrospray ionisation and multiple reaction monitoring modes. RESULTS: No significant interferences or carry-over were observed. Imprecisions, absolute relative biases, normalised matrix effects and recoveries were ≤15.0 %, ≤11.1 %, (94.7-104.1)% and (96.7-105.5)%, respectively. Non-linear measuring intervals were observed between (25-10,000) µg/L for total/plasma dialysate concentrations and linearity schemes (1.00-100) µg/L for buffer dialysate concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: The UHPLC-MS/MS procedures developed could be used for research purposes and therapeutic drug monitoring of antiretrovirals in routine clinical practice.

Dynamic profiles and predictive values of some biochemical and haematological quantities in COVID-19 inpatients.

INTRODUCTION: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in some hospitalized patients has shown some important alterations in laboratory tests. The aim of this study was to establish the most relevant quantities associated with the worst prognosis related to COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a descriptive, longitudinal, observational and retrospective study, in a cohort of 845 adult inpatients from Bellvitge University Hospital (L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain). A multivariate regression analysis was carried out in demographic, clinical and laboratory data, comparing survivors (SURV) and non-survivors (no-SURV). A receiver operating characteristic analysis was also carried out to establish the cut-off point for poor prognostic with better specificity and sensibility. Dynamic changes in clinical laboratory measurements were tracked from day 1 to day 28 after the onset of symptoms. RESULTS: During their hospital stay, 18% of the patients died. Age, kidney disease, creatinine (CREA), lactate-dehydrogenase (LD), C-reactive-protein (CRP) and lymphocyte (LYM) concentration showed the strongest independent associations with the risk of death in the multivariate regression analysis. Established cut-off values for poor prognosis for CREA, LD, CRP and LYM concentrations were 75.0 µmol /L, 320 U/L, 80.9 mg/L and 0.69 x109/L. Dynamic profile of laboratory findings, were in agreement with the consequences of organ damage and tissue destruction. CONCLUSIONS: Age, kidney disease, CREA, LD, CRP and LYM concentrations in COVID-19 patients from the southern region of Catalonia provide important information for their prognosis. Measurement of LD has demonstrated to be very good indicator of poor prognosis at initial evaluation because of its stability over time.

Estimation of the measurement uncertainty and practical suggestion for the description of the metrological traceability in clinical laboratories.

Clinicians request a large part of measurements of biological quantities that clinical laboratories perform for diagnostic, prognostic or diseases monitoring purposes. Thus, laboratories need to provide patient's results as reliable as possible. Metrological concepts like measurement uncertainty and metrological traceability allow to know the accuracy of these results and guarantee their comparability over time and space. Such is the importance of these two parameters that the estimation of measurement uncertainty and the knowledge of metrological traceability is required for clinical laboratories accredited by ISO 15189:2012. Despite there are many publications or guidelines to estimate the measurement uncertainty in clinical laboratories, it is not entirely clear what information and which formulae they should use to calculate it. On the other hand, unfortunately, there are a small number of clinical laboratories that know and describe the metrological traceability of their results, even though they are aware of the lack of comparability that currently exists for patient's results. Thus, to try to facilitate the task of clinical laboratories, this review aims to provide a proposal to estimate the measurement uncertainty. Also, different suggestions are shown to describe the metrological traceability. Measurement uncertainty estimation is partially based on the ISO/TS 20914:2019 guideline, and the metrological traceability described using the ISO 17511:2020. Different biological quantities routinely measured in clinical laboratories are used to exemplify the proposal and suggestions.

Measurement of ceftolozane and tazobactam concentrations in plasma by UHPLC-MS/MS. Clinical application in the management of difficult-to-treat osteoarticular infections.

BACKGROUND: Ceftolozane, in combination with the ß-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam, is a new option in the pipeline against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. As for other ß-lactam antibiotics, optimizing the use of ceftolozane-tazobactam is advisable, especially in difficult-to-treat infections. In this regard, therapeutic drug monitoring would be required to guide the treatment of ceftolozane-tazobactam. Thus, we aimed to develop and validate procedures based on UHPLC-MS/MS for measurement of ceftolozane and tazobactam plasma concentrations in clinical practice. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Analyses were conducted using an Acquity® UPLC® integrated system coupled to an Acquity® TQD® tandem-quadrupole mass spectrometer. Ceftolozane, tazobactam and their internal standards (ceftazidime-D5 and sulbactam) were detected by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry in positive and negative ion multiple reaction monitoring modes, using transitions of 667.2 → 199.3/139.0 and 551.9 → 467.9 for ceftolozane and ceftazidime-D5, and 299.0 → 138/254.9 and 232.0 → 140.0 for tazobactam and sulbactam. Measurement procedures developed were used for guiding the treatment and adjusting daily dose of ceftolozane-tazobactam in patients with osteoarticular infections. RESULTS: Coefficients of variation and absolute relative biases were <7.9% and 6.5% in all cases. The lower limit of quantification, linearity, normalized-recoveries, normalized-matrix effects and measurement uncertainties for ceftolozane were: 0.97 mg/L, (0.97-125) mg/L, ≤113.6%, ≤108.7%, and ≤ 18.7%, respectively; and for tazobactam: 1.04 mg/L, (1.04-125) mg/L, ≤103.6%, ≤101.9%, and ≤ 20.0%. No interferences and carry-over were observed. Patients plasma concentrations were higher than the recommended 3-4 times the minimal inhibitory concentrations. CONCLUSIONS: Our measurement procedures are suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring of ceftolozane-tazobactam in patients with osteoarticular infections.